Designated Runner Roman Quinn |
I have been a Philadelphia Phillies and therefore a (mostly) National League fan, ever since the A’s moved from Philadelphia to Kansas City in 1954. My fealty to the National League was reinforced when the American League adopted the designated hitter in 1973. While I am not usually a Luddite who resists all change to the National Pastime, I was then, and remain now, of the opinion that the designated hitter takes too much of the strategy out of the game. Neither of the leagues have consulted me on my feelings, however, so I am now determined to embrace the designated hitter with the full fervor of a manager trying to find a way to fit Nelson Cruz into the lineup.
My only question at this point is, “Why stop at the
designated hitter?” If we are to embrace increasing specialization in baseball,
why not go all in. One obvious need comes to mind as we move to the universal
DH. With all these aging sluggers a part of the everyday lineup, the chances
are pretty good that once or twice in a game these behemoths will be clogging
the basepaths and thereby slowing the game, not to mention everyone on the
bases behind them, down. The solution is simple: the designated runner.
Each game the manager gets to designate a player who will be used exclusively
as a designated runner for the designated hitter. This is a win-win. Management
gets a sped-up game, and the players union gets another roster spot. The
designated runner will also give speedy players who can’t hit, like Roman Quinn
and Jackie Bradley, Jr., a job.
Next, we need to have the designated pitcher. Seems
only fair. If the offense can have a designated hitter for the pitcher, the
defense should be allowed to have a designated pitcher for the pitcher. The
leagues have already experimented with this in spring training. When the
starting pitcher’s pitch count rises over 25 or so, the manager can bring a
pitcher in from the bullpen so his starter can rest and then go back out for
the next inning. So, let’s make this experiment the rule. No one wants pitchers
like Luis Severino or Zach Wheeler to overextend their million-dollar arms.
Once the starter reaches 25 pitches in an inning, the designated pitcher can
come in. Again, it’s a win-win. The organization gets to preserve its
investment in a premium arm and the players union gets a roster spot for a
marginal relief pitcher.
Logic now demands that we also have a designated fielder.
Picture this scenario. The Phillies are in the field. Aaron Nola is in a jam in
a one run game, with runners at first and third, one out, and the Rockies’
slugger Kris Bryant at the plate. This is no time for Nola to need to worry
about the shaky third base defense of an Alec Bohm. So, Phils’ manager Joe
Girardi calls timeout and sends his designated fielder, Ronnie Torreyes, out to
replace Bohm at third. With any luck, Bryant grounds sharply to third and “Toe”
starts an around the horn double play. Next inning, Bohm, and his bat are back
in the game.
Speaking of the Phillies, my hometown team seems to have
gone all in on this “designated” thing. They have even adopted it into the
radio booth where they now have a designated announcer for those games
that long time color man Larry Andersen doesn’t feel like working, which is
most days. The Phillies front office has responded by inviting a small army of
former Phils to sit in at the microphone this season. Among the designated
announcers will be Kevin Stocker, Chad Durbin, Erik Kratz, and Michael Bourn.
Heck in a pinch, I bet Bourn could still serve as a designated runner.
I have lamented in these pages in the past that the
designated hitter removes the bunt as a key strategic play in the manager’s
arsenal. No one is paying Nick Castellanos 25 million a season to lay down a
bunt. Now analytics tells us that usually bunting is not advantageous to a team,
but still, there are occasions where getting a runner into scoring position is
crucial- like when the game is in extra innings and there is a “ghost runner”
on second base. The obvious answer is the designated bunter. A player
who, during batting practice, for example, actually practices bunting. A player
who has a track record of getting a bunt down. Former second baseman Jay Bell,
who had 39 sacrifice bunts for the 1990 Pirates, could have a whole career
revival if they install the designated bunter.
Of course, all this designating may prove to be difficult to
keep straight if you are a major league manager. Imagine all those changes that
a guy like Buck Showalter, returning to the bench this season with the Mets
after four years in the broadcast booth, would need to keep track of. That is
why I would suggest a new coach be added to all major league teams’ benches –
the designated designator. This coach would have the sole responsibility
of deploying the designated hitters, runners, bunters, pitchers, and fielders during
the game. The designated designator would also keep full analytics on all the designees
and aid the manager in deciding which designee to designate on a designated day.
I do believe all this designation could go too far, however.
I sincerely hope that there is no truth to the rumor that the Houston Astros are
seeking a designated trash can banger. I also hope that Tom Brady has not
decided to come out of retirement because football’s Tampa Bay Bucs were able
to hire a designated ball deflator.
As you can see, I have fully embraced this whole designated
thing. I now look forward to attending some games this season, where I can find
my way to my designated seat, seek out my designated beer vendor, and hope I
can talk my companion into being the designated driver.
Very enjoyable article.
ReplyDeleteThanks
DeleteExcellent spook! Thanks!
ReplyDeleteSpoof not spook ay ay ay!
DeleteGreat article--funny! Just want to add that I resisted the DH for years, but have since surrendered to the reality that most pitchers these days aren't the slightest but interested in learning to hit, let alone bunt. It's become a black hole in the lineup. So, I give up!
ReplyDeleteBut if they were required to, they would be better.
DeleteWhen the final history is written it will be noted that no major sport was more harmed by its managements lousy decisions than MLB. It likely started in earnest with ballclubs becoming appendages of huge corporate enterprises. Although the era of private owners was hardly devoid of poor decisions there was at least the continuing presence of baseball people AKA as “lifers” looking out for all that made the game unique. For decades baseball has been run by Wharton School MBA types often with little concern for anything other than the bottom line. Instead of maintaining and building on all that makes baseball unique they instead made the decision that baseball must b3 more like FB and the NBA. More scoring, more playoffs, longer games, more excitement, cookie cutter stadiums and a World Series that lasts until snow falls and always is so late starting that youngsters fall asleep by the third inning.
ReplyDeleteThe players are better than ever but in another decade or two, no one will care.
You’ve summed it up very well. I remain an optimist that not even these corporate types can kill it..
Delete